Monday, January 19

UC should allocate its rainy day funds


Instead of cutting programs, university must utilize resources, invest in education, staff

EDITORIAL BOARD Editor in
Chief
 Timothy Kudo

Managing Editor
 Michael Falcone

Viewpoint Editor
 Cuauhtemoc Ortega

Staff Representatives
 Maegan Carberry
 Edward Chiao
 Kelly Rayburn

Editorial Board Assistants
 Maegan Carberry
 Edward Chiao

  Unsigned editorials represent a majority opinion of
the Daily Bruin Editorial Board. All other columns, letters and
artwork represent the opinions of their authors.   All
submitted material must bear the author’s name, address, telephone
number, registration number, or affiliation with UCLA. Names will
not be withheld except in extreme cases.   The Bruin
complies with the Communication Board’s policy prohibiting the
publication of articles that perpetuate derogatory cultural or
ethnic stereotypes.   When multiple authors submit
material, some names may be kept on file rather than published with
the material. The Bruin reserves the right to edit submitted
material and to determine its placement in the paper. All
submissions become the property of The Bruin. The Communications
Board has a media grievance procedure for resolving complaints
against any of its publications. For a copy of the complete
procedure, contact the Publications office at 118 Kerckhoff Hall.
Daily Bruin 118 Kerckhoff Hall 308 Westwood Plaza Los Angeles, CA
90024 (310) 825-9898

While the university talks about raising student fees and
cutting programs because of an economic downturn, they are also
choosing to sit on almost $2 billion in non-specified, unrestricted
funds accruing from at least 1991 through the 2000 fiscal year.
It’s understandable that the university wants to have
emergency funds for a rainy day. But while it’s not yet
pouring on the UC, the drizzle has already started.

Among the many groups that would benefit from the university
spending extra money is the Coalition of University Employees, a
union that has repeatedly lobbied the university for increases in
wages. Working for $20,000 to $30,000 a year has translated into an
average 54 percent quitting rate of the UC clerical employees the
union represents. And after the state’s recent budget
downturn, prospects of increased wages have diminished. Allocating
the 7.5 percent pay increase the union seeks from this fund would
be a strong show of support for living wages and would help
maintain consistency in the various departments these employees
work in.

The money should also be invested in education. Much of the
UC’s funding is spent on research, instead of classroom
academics. The problem with this is that there are many alternative
sources of funding for research from entities like the federal
government and private donations. Classroom academics, however,
receive their funding from the state. The importance of funding
research is indisputable, but when an opportunity to aid classroom
academics is available ““ especially when tight funding
accompanies rising demands on resources ““ we must take
it.


Comments are supposed to create a forum for thoughtful, respectful community discussion. Please be nice. View our full comments policy here.