Veterans deserve respect, but military allows free
speech
I would have preferred that the Daily Bruin had profiled a
veteran like Cpl. Edwin Kim ““ rather than one like me ““
for its Veterans Day issue.
One of the greatest sources of misgivings that I face is the
realization that what I do and say may be cast as disrespectful to
the armed services.
While I am proud to have volunteered, I understand that the
price of being vocally anti-war is the possibility of being
mistakenly painted as an opponent of the military.
While Kim’s response to my actions (“Military
personnel should not use position for political reasons,”
Letters, Nov. 15) is neither unexpected nor uncalled for, I feel
compelled to address it.
I did not violate the Uniform Code of Military Justice. I had
already been honorably discharged before my letter was published,
and consequently, before I decided to speak.
That, however, is a minor answer to a major question. The
sentiment of his argument remains ““ the military relies on
selfless service and obedience to orders. Neither is served by my
opinions and actions.
I reply that the Uniform Code of Military Justice protects every
service member’s right to refuse unlawful orders. Military
regulations further protect each service member’s right to
apply for conscientious objector status.
While these rights may be guaranteed more in print than in
practice, they underscore the fact that each soldier, sailor,
airman and marine is bound to weigh the moral ramifications of his
actions.
The letter to the editor format does not allow for the space
necessary to fully articulate my reasons for opposition, but I will
happily speak with anyone who will listen. You can e-mail me at
[email protected].
I will also gladly shake the hand of any veteran on campus.
Jasaun Neff Fourth-year, history