There’s no doubt ““ Anica McKesey is the best candidate for president. McKesey will bring to the president’s office the comprehensive perspective it sorely lacks. No other candidate is as focused or has worked on addressing issues affecting the entire campus ““ such as student fee hikes and decreasing student services ““ more than McKesey. Read more...
Opinion
|
May 4, 9:00 pm
Endorsement: McKesey’s leadership skills outshine opponents’
Opinion
|
May 4, 9:00 pm
Endorsement: Nguyen has capacity to execute her plans
Tutram Nguyen’s ideas and her sense of how to accomplish them earns her our endorsement for Facilities commissioner. Nguyen’s plan to rethink the campus shuttle system to fund BruinGo! Read more...
Opinion
|
May 4, 9:00 pm
Endorsement: Concrete ideas make Kelly Wynn stand out
While an out-of-house candidate often may be elected and succeed admirably, in the case of this year’s Cultural Affairs commissioner, Kelly Wynn clearly has the experience and vision necessary to run the office. Read more...
Opinion
|
May 4, 9:00 pm
Endorsement: Schreiber shows commitment to outreach, co-programming
Justin Schreiber has a vision: to bring back UCLA’s commitment to community service. We endorse Schreiber for Community Service commissioner because he is the perfect candidate for making this vision a reality. Read more...
Opinion
|
May 4, 9:00 pm
Endorsement: Gaulton needs to display more maturity, sensitivity
While Jason Gaulton has two years of experience on the Campus Events Commission, he still struggles with sensitivity issues similar to those weakening this year’s and last year’s commission. Read more...
Opinion
|
May 4, 9:00 pm
Endorsement: Kozak qualified to stress diversity in academic affairs
Academic Affairs commissioner candidate Sophia Kozak exhibits a strong comprehension of the duties and direction of the Academic Affairs Commission, and is the best candidate among the three running. Read more...
Opinion
|
May 1, 9:00 pm
Revenues from fee increase helped no one
During fall quarter controversy arose over a programming referendum to raise student fees. Among the strongest proponents of the referendum were the USAC commissions (particularly Student Welfare, Community Service and Cultural Affairs). Read more...